When ethernet enable again after disable it before, phy init will report timeout.
The cause of this problem is that the enabling of emac clock is too late, and should be placed before phy init.
1. Fix interrupt watchdog timeout in bluetooth "btdm_bb_isr"
2. Fix BLE assert(512) or assert(1536) in rwble.c at line 222
3. Update librtc.a to fix BLE assert(512) in rwble.c at line 222
The #1 and #2 occurs random.
The #3 bug occurs in certain scenario:
1. If Wifi start softap and BLE is working
2. If wifi start station, but do not use normal station operation, such
as just use espnow, while BLE is working
3. Any other scenario, that wifi works without use software coexist
operation, while BLE is working(such as do advertising and ...)
4. update libcoexist.a version to v1.1.2
1. replace xunitgen with junit_xml, which can log more info
2. allow test cases to handle junit test report by them own
3. allow test cases to log some info into report via `sysout` tag
Fix some Wifi bugs:
1. Enable RX BAR
2. Fix the bug that ESP32 AP negotiates with iphone to 11g
3. Fix the bug that ESP32 STA has ap_loss because CMCC AP contains two SSID
1. fix failture of mesh stop caused by block-sending.
2. fix when FIXED_ROOT is set, 2nd layer devices can not receive mesh event ESP_ERR_MESH_NO_PARENT_FOUND.
3. fix when FIXED_ROOT is set and the root turns off mesh function, 2nd layer devices do not look for new parents.
4. add APIs esp_mesh_disconnect() and esp_mesh_connect().
5. disconnect from parent/router when the DSSS channel in received beacon is different from the home channel.
6. remove nvs task to release 3k bytes memory.
Having two different spinlocks is problematic due to possibly
different order in which the locks will be taken. Changing the order
would require significant restructuring of kernel code which is
undesirable.
An additional place where taking xTickCountMutex was needed was in
vApplicationSleep function. Not taking xTickCountMutex resulted in
other CPU sometimes possibly advancing tick count while light sleep
entry/exit was happening. Taking xTickCountMutex in addition to
xTaskQueueMutex has shown a problem that in different code paths,
these two spinlocks could be taken in different order, leading to
(unlikely, but possible) deadlocks.
When light sleep is finished on one CPU, it is possible that the other
CPU will enter light sleep again very soon, before interrupts on the
first CPU get a chance to run. To avoid such situation, set a flag
for the other CPU to skip light sleep attempt.
Tickless idle/light sleep procedure had a bug in single core mode.
Consider the flow of events:
1. Idle task runs and calls vApplicationIdleHook
2. This calls esp_vApplicationIdleHook, which calls esp_pm_impl_idle_hook, and pm lock for RTOS on the current core is released.
3. Then esp_vApplicationIdleHook calls esp_pm_impl_waiti, which checks that s_entered_light_sleep[core_id]==false and goes into waiti state.
4. Some interrupt happens, calls esp_pm_impl_isr_hook, which takes pm lock for RTOS. PM state goes back to CPU_FREQ_MAX.
5. Once the interrupt is over, vApplicationIdleHook returns, and Idle task continues to run, finally reaching the call to vApplicationSleep.
6. vApplicationSleep does not enter light sleep, because esp_pm_impl_isr_hook has already changed PM state from IDLE to CPU_FREQ_MAX.
This didn’t happen in dual core mode, because waiti state of one CPU was interrupted by CCOMPARE update interrupt from the other CPU, in which case PM lock for FreeRTOS was not taken.
Fix by inverting the meaning of the flag (for convenience) and only setting it to true when vApplicationSleep actually fails to enter light sleep.
