A workaround to reset BBPLL configuration after light sleep. Fixes the
issue that Wi-Fi can not receive packets after waking up from light
sleep.
Ref. https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/2711
On enabling flash encryption, OTA fails with magic byte error in the second chunk
if the http data is split into two or more chunks and first chunk is less than 16.
This fix includes following changes:
1. Fix the bug that esp_restart()/esp_wifi_stop() sometimes fails in WiFi/BT coexist mode.
2. Add a timer for WiFi stop and stop WiFi forcibly once the timer expires.
1. start an esp_timer on entering sleep to acquire pm_lock before wake up from modem sleep
2. decrease the clock division of XTAL fed to bluetooth low power clock from 32us to 2us period to allow to work under 240MHz Max CPU frequency
3. decrease the minimum sleep duration threshold to allow shorter bluetooth modem sleep period, especially for BLE with short connection interval
4. reconfigure bluetooth baseband(BT-BB) settings after PHY/RF init upon waking up from modem sleep to avoid packet RX/TX performance degradation
Introduced in 9c23b8e5 and 4f87a62f. To get higher speed, menuconfig
options are added to put ISR and other functions into the IRAM. The
interrupt flag ESP_INTR_FLAG_IRAM is also mistakenly set when the ISR is
put into the IRAM. However callbacks, which are wrote by the user, are
called in the master and slave ISR. The user may not be aware of that
these callbacks are not disabled during flash operations. Any cache miss
during flash operation will cause panic.
Essentially IRAM functions and intrrupt flag ESP_INTR_FLAG_IRAM are
different, the latter means not disabling the ISR during flash
operations. New bus_config flag intr_flags is offered to help set the
interrupt attribute, including priority level, SHARED, IRAM (not
disabled during flash operations). It introduced a small BREAK to
IDFv3.1 (but the same as IDFv3.0) that the user has to manually set IRAM
flag now (therefore he's aware of the IRAM thing) to void the ISR being
disabled during flash operations.
1. Fix interrupt watchdog timeout in bluetooth "btdm_bb_isr"
2. Fix BLE assert(512) or assert(1536) in rwble.c at line 222
3. Update librtc.a to fix BLE assert(512) in rwble.c at line 222
The #1 and #2 occurs random.
The #3 bug occurs in certain scenario:
1. If Wifi start softap and BLE is working
2. If wifi start station, but do not use normal station operation, such
as just use espnow, while BLE is working
3. Any other scenario, that wifi works without use software coexist
operation, while BLE is working(such as do advertising and ...)
4. update libcoexist.a version to v1.1.2
The number of runners of integration test is not bottleneck to CI
pipeline performance now. Combine these 2 stages will make integration
test executed even unit test fails. This could help us to collect more
info about test history.
1. replace xunitgen with junit_xml, which can log more info
2. allow test cases to handle junit test report by them own
3. allow test cases to log some info into report via `sysout` tag
This commit resolves a blocking in esp_aes_block function.
Introduce:
The problem was in the fact that AES is switched off at the moment when he should give out the processed data. But because of the disabled, the operation can not be completed successfully, there is an infinite hang. The reason for this behavior is that the registers for controlling the inclusion of AES, SHA, MPI have shared registers and they were not protected from sharing.
Fix some related issue with shared using of AES SHA RSA accelerators.
Closes: https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/2295#issuecomment-432898137
Fix some wifi bugs
1. Enable RX BAR
2. Fix the bug that ESP32 AP negotiates with iphone to 11g
3. Fix the bug that ESP32 STA has ap_loss because CMCC AP contains two SSID
mdns queries did not work properly when send imeadiately after set_hostname, which cuased reinit of pcb and therefore restarted probing, so search packets were blocked until probing finished
closes#2507, closes#2593
Having two different spinlocks is problematic due to possibly
different order in which the locks will be taken. Changing the order
would require significant restructuring of kernel code which is
undesirable.
An additional place where taking xTickCountMutex was needed was in
vApplicationSleep function. Not taking xTickCountMutex resulted in
other CPU sometimes possibly advancing tick count while light sleep
entry/exit was happening. Taking xTickCountMutex in addition to
xTaskQueueMutex has shown a problem that in different code paths,
these two spinlocks could be taken in different order, leading to
(unlikely, but possible) deadlocks.
