component/heap : fix heap_region_add check bug

This commit is contained in:
Tian Hao 2017-11-14 11:52:12 +08:00
parent e64b9ecaf4
commit e7a9ddcf72
2 changed files with 46 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -226,16 +226,37 @@ esp_err_t heap_caps_add_region(intptr_t start, intptr_t end)
esp_err_t heap_caps_add_region_with_caps(const uint32_t caps[], intptr_t start, intptr_t end)
{
esp_err_t err = ESP_FAIL;
if (caps == NULL || start == 0 || end == 0 || end < start) {
if (caps == NULL || start == 0 || end == 0 || end <= start) {
return ESP_ERR_INVALID_ARG;
}
//Check if region overlaps the start and/or end of an existing region. If so, the
//region is invalid (or maybe added twice)
/*
* assume that in on region, start must be less than end (cannot equal to) !!
* Specially, the 4th scenario can be allowed. For example, allocate memory from heap,
* then change the capability and call this function to create a new region for special
* application.
* In the following chart, 'start = start' and 'end = end' is contained in 3rd scenario.
* This all equal scenario is incorrect because the same region cannot be add twice. For example,
* add the .bss memory to region twice, if not do the check, it will cause exception.
*
* the existing heap region s(tart) e(nd)
* |----------------------|
* 1.add region [Correct] (s1<s && e1<=s) |-----|
* 2.add region [Incorrect] (s2<=s && s<e2<=e) |---------------|
* 3.add region [Incorrect] (s3<=s && e<e3) |-------------------------------------|
* 4 add region [Correct] (s<s4<e && s<e4<=e) |-------|
* 5.add region [Incorrect] (s<s5<e && e<e5) |----------------------------|
* 6.add region [Correct] (e<=s6 && e<e6) |----|
*/
heap_t *heap;
SLIST_FOREACH(heap, &registered_heaps, next) {
if ( start <= heap->start && heap->start <=end ) return ESP_FAIL;
if ( start <= heap->end && heap->end <=end ) return ESP_FAIL;
if ((start <= heap->start && end > heap->start)
|| (start < heap->end && end > heap->end)) {
return ESP_FAIL;
}
}
heap_t *p_new = malloc(sizeof(heap_t));

View file

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ TEST_CASE("Allocate new heap at runtime", "[heap][ignore]")
uint32_t after_free = esp_get_free_heap_size();
printf("Before %u after %u\n", before_free, after_free);
/* allow for some 'heap overhead' from accounting structures */
TEST_ASSERT(after_free > before_free + BUF_SZ - HEAP_OVERHEAD_MAX);
TEST_ASSERT(after_free >= before_free + BUF_SZ - HEAP_OVERHEAD_MAX);
}
/* NOTE: This is not a well-formed unit test, it leaks memory and
@ -45,3 +45,24 @@ TEST_CASE("Allocate new heap with new capability", "[heap][ignore]")
TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL( heap_caps_malloc(ALLOC_SZ, MALLOC_CAP_INVENTED) );
}
/* NOTE: This is not a well-formed unit test.
* If run twice without a reset, it will failed.
*/
TEST_CASE("Add .bss memory to heap region runtime", "[heap][ignore]")
{
#define BUF_SZ 1000
#define HEAP_OVERHEAD_MAX 200
static uint8_t s_buffer[BUF_SZ];
printf("s_buffer start %08x end %08x\n", (intptr_t)s_buffer, (intptr_t)s_buffer + BUF_SZ);
uint32_t before_free = esp_get_free_heap_size();
TEST_ESP_OK( heap_caps_add_region((intptr_t)s_buffer, (intptr_t)s_buffer + BUF_SZ) );
uint32_t after_free = esp_get_free_heap_size();
printf("Before %u after %u\n", before_free, after_free);
/* allow for some 'heap overhead' from accounting structures */
TEST_ASSERT(after_free >= before_free + BUF_SZ - HEAP_OVERHEAD_MAX);
/* Twice add must be failed */
TEST_ASSERT( (heap_caps_add_region((intptr_t)s_buffer, (intptr_t)s_buffer + BUF_SZ) != ESP_OK) );
}