From e7a9ddcf723d1d7dfd8b0c1311bef6cc7533ea38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tian Hao Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:52:12 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] component/heap : fix heap_region_add check bug --- components/heap/heap_caps_init.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++--- components/heap/test/test_runtime_heap_reg.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/components/heap/heap_caps_init.c b/components/heap/heap_caps_init.c index c964c655e..a2b66bfc7 100644 --- a/components/heap/heap_caps_init.c +++ b/components/heap/heap_caps_init.c @@ -226,16 +226,37 @@ esp_err_t heap_caps_add_region(intptr_t start, intptr_t end) esp_err_t heap_caps_add_region_with_caps(const uint32_t caps[], intptr_t start, intptr_t end) { esp_err_t err = ESP_FAIL; - if (caps == NULL || start == 0 || end == 0 || end < start) { + if (caps == NULL || start == 0 || end == 0 || end <= start) { return ESP_ERR_INVALID_ARG; } //Check if region overlaps the start and/or end of an existing region. If so, the //region is invalid (or maybe added twice) + /* + * assume that in on region, start must be less than end (cannot equal to) !! + * Specially, the 4th scenario can be allowed. For example, allocate memory from heap, + * then change the capability and call this function to create a new region for special + * application. + * In the following chart, 'start = start' and 'end = end' is contained in 3rd scenario. + * This all equal scenario is incorrect because the same region cannot be add twice. For example, + * add the .bss memory to region twice, if not do the check, it will cause exception. + * + * the existing heap region s(tart) e(nd) + * |----------------------| + * 1.add region [Correct] (s1start && heap->start <=end ) return ESP_FAIL; - if ( start <= heap->end && heap->end <=end ) return ESP_FAIL; + if ((start <= heap->start && end > heap->start) + || (start < heap->end && end > heap->end)) { + return ESP_FAIL; + } } heap_t *p_new = malloc(sizeof(heap_t)); diff --git a/components/heap/test/test_runtime_heap_reg.c b/components/heap/test/test_runtime_heap_reg.c index 766e5ce3b..f60b1d018 100644 --- a/components/heap/test/test_runtime_heap_reg.c +++ b/components/heap/test/test_runtime_heap_reg.c @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ TEST_CASE("Allocate new heap at runtime", "[heap][ignore]") uint32_t after_free = esp_get_free_heap_size(); printf("Before %u after %u\n", before_free, after_free); /* allow for some 'heap overhead' from accounting structures */ - TEST_ASSERT(after_free > before_free + BUF_SZ - HEAP_OVERHEAD_MAX); + TEST_ASSERT(after_free >= before_free + BUF_SZ - HEAP_OVERHEAD_MAX); } /* NOTE: This is not a well-formed unit test, it leaks memory and @@ -45,3 +45,24 @@ TEST_CASE("Allocate new heap with new capability", "[heap][ignore]") TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL( heap_caps_malloc(ALLOC_SZ, MALLOC_CAP_INVENTED) ); } +/* NOTE: This is not a well-formed unit test. + * If run twice without a reset, it will failed. + */ + +TEST_CASE("Add .bss memory to heap region runtime", "[heap][ignore]") +{ +#define BUF_SZ 1000 +#define HEAP_OVERHEAD_MAX 200 + static uint8_t s_buffer[BUF_SZ]; + + printf("s_buffer start %08x end %08x\n", (intptr_t)s_buffer, (intptr_t)s_buffer + BUF_SZ); + uint32_t before_free = esp_get_free_heap_size(); + TEST_ESP_OK( heap_caps_add_region((intptr_t)s_buffer, (intptr_t)s_buffer + BUF_SZ) ); + uint32_t after_free = esp_get_free_heap_size(); + printf("Before %u after %u\n", before_free, after_free); + /* allow for some 'heap overhead' from accounting structures */ + TEST_ASSERT(after_free >= before_free + BUF_SZ - HEAP_OVERHEAD_MAX); + + /* Twice add must be failed */ + TEST_ASSERT( (heap_caps_add_region((intptr_t)s_buffer, (intptr_t)s_buffer + BUF_SZ) != ESP_OK) ); +}