Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ivan Grokhotkov
91d35f01f2 Merge branch 'bugfix/i2c_spikes_on_master_init_#393_from_github' into 'master'
bugfix: I2C spikes on master init

Fix I2C spikes on master init.
Before I2C io init, set high level on SDA/SCK IOs.

Fixes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/393

See merge request !593
2017-03-21 15:09:16 +08:00
Wangjialin
1ad68de8b8 bugfix: I2C spikes on master init #393 from github
Fix I2C spikes on master init.
This issue is reported from https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/393
Before I2C io init, set high level on SDA/SCK IOs.
2017-03-19 17:05:07 +08:00
Wangjialin
94b91ee4af bugfix: i2c driver not working in 'RELEASE' configuration
This issue is reported from https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/304.
We found that when we operate the hw command registers in I2C struct, sometimes the behaviour would be different in DEBUG/RELEASE optimisation level:

The code looks like this:
I2C[i2c_num]->command[p_i2c->cmd_idx].byte_num -= 0;

In DEBUG configuration:
I2C[i2c_num]->command[p_i2c->cmd_idx].byte_num -= 0;
400f3ab0:    3388          l32i.n    a8, a3, 12
400f3ab2:    14c882            addi    a8, a8, 20
400f3ab5:    a08840            addx4    a8, a8, a4
400f3ab8:    0020c0            memw
400f3abb:    2898          l32i.n    a9, a8, 8
400f3abd:    0020c0            memw
400f3ac0:    28b8          l32i.n    a11, a8, 8
400f3ac2:    74a090            extui    a10, a9, 0, 8
400f3ac5:    00af92            movi    a9, 0xffffff00
400f3ac8:    109b90            and    a9, a11, a9
400f3acb:    2099a0            or    a9, a9, a10
400f3ace:    0020c0            memw
400f3ad1:    2899          s32i.n    a9, a8, 8

In RELEASE configuration:
I2C[i2c_num]->command[p_i2c->cmd_idx].byte_num -= 0;
400f2ba2:    580572            l8ui    a7, a5, 88
400f2ba5:    747070            extui    a7, a7, 0, 8
400f2ba8:    0020c0            memw
400f2bab:    584572            s8i    a7, a5, 88

Looks like the compiler will make it a 8bit operation after optimisation.
But the register value changes from 0x901 to 0x101.
After this 8-bit optimisation, the 11th bit changed from 1 to zero, which caused this error.

We are still trying to find out why that happens, because there might be some risk when operating the register struct.
This is a workaround to avoid "-=" operation on I2C register struct fields.
2017-03-19 16:09:44 +08:00
devsaurus
d8fb30c930 i2c: fix i2c_get_period name
rename i2s_get_period to i2c_get_period
2017-01-16 02:37:10 +08:00
Wangjialin
9c7cc86793 1. modify i2c_set_pin function
2. update example comments and other minor changes
3. rename API:  i2c_cmd_link_create/i2c_cmd_link_delete (+4 squashed commits)

Squashed commits:
[2e0ac3e] 1. coding style: add one space after condition key words.
2. modify i2c.h, use gpio_num_t instead of int, improve comments of return values
3. add i2c index in index.rst
4. add readme for i2c example
[4991d92] update i2c.doc
[88b672e] driver: i2c

1. add mux and spin lock to run in a thread-safe way.
2. modify example code
[4eb15fe] driver: i2c code

1. add i2c master code
2. add i2c slave code
3. add i2c example code
4. add DRAM_ATTR for I2C array
2017-01-03 00:57:19 +08:00