If zero-overhead loop buffer is enabled, under certain rare conditions
when executing a zero-overhead loop, the CPU may attempt to execute an invalid instruction. Work around by disabling the buffer.
Due to a hardware limitation in ESP32, the first four bytes of some
CSI data is invalid, not the last four bytes.
Correct a mistake of CSI sub-carrier index in documentation.
closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/2494
closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/pull/2493
closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/pull/2496
1. Change bus reset to handle interrupted READ sequences.
2. Slow down I2C to 100khz during reset
3. If a SLAVE device was in a read operation when the bus was interrupted, the SLAVE device is controlling SDA.The only bit during the 9 clock cycles of a byte READ the MASTER(ESP32) is guaranteed control over, is during the ACK bit period.
If the SLAVE is sending a stream of ZERO bytes, it will only release SDA during the ACK bit period. The master(ESP32) cannot generate a STOP unless SDA is HIGH. So, this reset code synchronizes the bit stream with, Either, the ACK bit, Or a 1 bit.
I am stealing this delay coding from @jeremyherbert #2493 pr.
2. Change Bus Reset to handle interrupted READ sequences.
The current code does not handle interrupted READ cycles.
If a SLAVE device was in a read operation when the bus was interrupted, the SLAVE device is controlling SDA.
The only bit during the 9 clock cycles of a byte READ the MASTER(ESP32) is guaranteed control over, is during the ACK bit period.
If the SLAVE is sending a stream of ZERO bytes, it will only release SDA during the ACK bit period. The master(ESP32) cannot generate a STOP unless SDA is HIGH.
So, this reset code synchronizes the bit stream with, Either, the ACK bit, Or a 1 bit.
3. fix typo
correct `sda_id` to `sda_io` in `i2c_master_clear_bus()` @ryan-ma found it. This typo was generated when I manually edited this patch on GitHub, I should have done a Copy/Paste operation!
1. fix bug PHY/RTC functions called in ISR (update phy to v4007)
2. add UnitTest to test it
3. fix task watchdog bug when wifi change channel
4. disable/enable agc to mac deinit/init
tools: Be more helpful to MSYS32 users with package installation & check if current python is inside virtual environment (backport v3.2)
See merge request idf/esp-idf!4063
state and reduce force receiving broadcast data time
1. If receiving beacon which indicates that there is no data buffered,
do not force to receive WiFi data.
2. If receiving beacon which indicates that there is broadcast data
buffered, reduce the time to force receiving broadcast data.
timer_process_alarm function of esp_timer holds a spinlock for the
entire duration of its operation, except for the time when timer
callback function is called. It is possible that when
timer_process_alarm releases the spinlock, a higher priority task may
run and delete the timer. Then the execution will return to
timer_process_alarm, and this will either cause a crash, or undesired
execution of callback after the timer has been stopped or deleted.
To solve this problem, add a mutex which will prevent deletion of timers
while callbacks are being dispatched.
It has been observed that, in case of underflow (data unavailability) in
I2S transmission, previously filled up tx descriptors continue to get
transmitted on line, causing noise in case of audio use case.
This change adds optional `tx_desc_auto_clear` field during I2S driver intialization
than can zero initialize tx descriptor in case of underflow situation in
interrupt handler itself.
Closes: https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/1789
(cherry picked from commit 765bf674d0)
Update freemodbus component file esp-idf/components/freemodbus/port/portserial.c to remove UART mode settings;
Move UART mode settings into esp-idf/examples/protocols/modbus_slave/main/freemodbus.c
Move UART pin settings from Component config into example Kconfig.projbuild file
Move setup of UART port pins from freemodbus component into example file
TW#27721
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/2784#issuecomment-443600157