Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael (XIAO Xufeng)
5c9dc44c49 spi: multichip support
move hardcoded numbers, etc. into soc files.
create headers for shared types which needs to be documented.

(MINOR CHANGE)
2019-06-20 10:38:52 +08:00
Michael (XIAO Xufeng)
1036a091fe spi_flash: support working on differnt buses and frequency 2019-06-18 06:32:52 +00:00
Gautier Seidel
542e544faa esp32: Allow fixed static RAM size and DRAM heap size
Merges https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/pull/3222
2019-06-06 18:23:04 +10:00
Michael (XIAO Xufeng)
33db6d608e spi_slave: add HAL support 2019-05-20 07:34:34 +00:00
michael
0b523c2300 spi_master: fix the dual/quad io issue
introduced in f871cc5ffa

The issue is caused by

1. The hal didn't pass the io_mode to LL.
2. The setup_device function overwrite the trans-specific settings.
2019-04-27 01:36:47 +08:00
Michael (XIAO Xufeng)
562af8f65e global: move the soc component out of the common list
This MR removes the common dependency from every IDF components to the SOC component.

Currently, in the ``idf_functions.cmake`` script, we include the header path of SOC component by default for all components.
But for better code organization (or maybe also benifits to the compiling speed), we may remove the dependency to SOC components for most components except the driver and kernel related components.

In CMAKE, we have two kinds of header visibilities (set by include path visibility):

(Assume component A --(depends on)--> B, B is the current component)

1. public (``COMPONENT_ADD_INCLUDEDIRS``): means this path is visible to other depending components (A) (visible to A and B)
2. private (``COMPONENT_PRIV_INCLUDEDIRS``): means this path is only visible to source files inside the component (visible to B only)

and we have two kinds of depending ways:

(Assume component A --(depends on)--> B --(depends on)--> C, B is the current component)

1. public (```COMPONENT_REQUIRES```): means B can access to public include path of C. All other components rely on you (A) will also be available for the public headers. (visible to A, B)
2. private (``COMPONENT_PRIV_REQUIRES``): means B can access to public include path of C, but don't propagate this relation to other components (A). (visible to B)

1. remove the common requirement in ``idf_functions.cmake``, this makes the SOC components invisible to all other components by default.
2. if a component (for example, DRIVER) really needs the dependency to SOC, add a private dependency to SOC for it.
3. some other components that don't really depends on the SOC may still meet some errors saying "can't find header soc/...", this is because it's depended component (DRIVER) incorrectly include the header of SOC in its public headers. Moving all this kind of #include into source files, or private headers
4. Fix the include requirements for some file which miss sufficient #include directives. (Previously they include some headers by the long long long header include link)

This is a breaking change. Previous code may depends on the long include chain.
You may need to include the following headers for some files after this commit:

- soc/soc.h
- soc/soc_memory_layout.h
- driver/gpio.h
- esp_sleep.h

The major broken include chain includes:

1. esp_system.h no longer includes esp_sleep.h. The latter includes driver/gpio.h and driver/touch_pad.h.
2. ets_sys.h no longer includes soc/soc.h
3. freertos/portmacro.h no longer includes soc/soc_memory_layout.h

some peripheral headers no longer includes their hw related headers, e.g. rom/gpio.h no longer includes soc/gpio_pins.h and soc/gpio_reg.h

BREAKING CHANGE
2019-04-16 13:21:15 +08:00
Michael (XIAO Xufeng)
af2fc96ee1 spi_master: refactor and add HAL support 2019-03-28 17:14:50 +08:00
Angus Gratton
a5ae5ac4b3 soc: Allow components to reserve fixed memory ranges that they need
No longer necessary to keep all reserved addresses in 'soc'.

Means 'soc' does not need to know about 'bt', for example.

Also means that Bluetooth can be enabled in config without any memory being reserved for BT
controller. Only if code calling the BT controller is linked in, will this memory be reserved...
2018-08-06 01:37:55 +00:00