From issue:
I did some poking around in components/spiffs/project_include.cmake and
it looks like what is failing is it isn't getting an offset from
parttool.py. I think what the problem is that the parttool.py cannot
determine the offset of the storage partition as I can't run menuconfig
to set the custom partitions.
I have tested that this problem is solvable by manually setting the
custom partitions in sdkconfig and that is a workaround but there should
be at least a better error message in the configuration when it cannot
find the partition as this would also happen if the partition name was
misspelled.
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/4236
GCC prefixes underscore on symbol names on macOS, and so the set
undefined symbol `-u app_main` won't work. However, this is unecessary,
as the source file that defines it is specified directly to the
executable, and not through a static library.
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/4168
Use rev-parse to get the HEAD directory instead of manually looking for
it. This method works in the main repository, worktrees and submodules.
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/4136
This commit makes it so that BUILD_COMPONENT holds only the component,
and a new property BUILD_COMPONENT_ALIASES hold the full name of the
component.
This also removes erroneous check for duplicate components, as this can
never happen:
(1) if two components have the same name but different prefixes,
the internal names are still unique between them
(2)if two components happen to have the same name and same prefix, the
latter would override the former
Previous implementation only builds list of components included in the
build during component registration.
Since the build components is known as the requirements expansion is
ongoing, update the list here instead.
Use imported library, which does not create additional rules, but still
allows attaching arbitraty properties instead of custom targets. This
allows the targets to not appear in the target list of IDEs such as
CLion.
The workaround for PSRAM that will occupy an SPI bus is enabled only when:
1. used on 32MBit ver 0 PSRAM.
2. work at 80MHz.
The test used to only check 32MBit by the config option, but for PSRAM
on Wrover-B module seems to use a newer version of 32MBit PSRAM. So it
expects the workaround to be enabled, but actually not.
This commit split the unit test into two parts:
1. check all SPI buses are available, for all configs except psram_hspi
and psram_vspi, run on regular runners (including Wrover and Wrover-B).
a hidden option is enabled so that the compiler knows it's not building
psram_hspi or psram_vspi.
2. check the specified bus are acquired, for config psram_hspi and
psram_vspi. This only run on special runner (legacy Wrover module).
