Crash_Override/OVMS3-idf
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

test: collect performance for esp-timer / spinlock

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
He Yin Ling 2017-11-13 16:58:46 +08:00
parent 879160de8c
commit 0c40b2ec9d
2 changed files with 10 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
components/esp32/test/test_esp_timer.c
View file

@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include "freertos/semphr.h"
#include "test_utils.h"
TEST_CASE("esp_timer orders timers correctly", "[esp_timer]")
{
void dummy_cb(void* arg)
@ -335,8 +336,7 @@ TEST_CASE("esp_timer_get_time call takes less than 1us", "[esp_timer]")
end = esp_timer_get_time();
}
int ns_per_call = (int) ((end - begin) * 1000 / iter_count);
printf("esp_timer_get_time: %dns per call\n", ns_per_call);
TEST_ASSERT(ns_per_call < 1000);
TEST_PERFORMANCE_LESS_THAN(ESP_TIMER_GET_TIME_PER_CALL, "%dns", ns_per_call);
}
/* This test runs for about 10 minutes and is disabled in CI.

8
components/freertos/test/test_spinlocks.c
View file

@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
#include "soc/io_mux_reg.h"
#include "soc/cpu.h"
#include "idf_performance.h"
#define REPEAT_OPS 10000
static uint32_t start, end;
@ -42,6 +44,12 @@ TEST_CASE("portMUX spinlocks (no contention)", "[freertos]")
portEXIT_CRITICAL(&mux);
}
BENCHMARK_END("no contention lock");
#ifdef CONFIG_FREERTOS_UNICORE
TEST_PERFORMANCE_LESS_THAN(FREERTOS_SPINLOCK_CYCLES_PER_OP_UNICORE, "%d cycles/op", ((end - start)/REPEAT_OPS));
#else
TEST_PERFORMANCE_LESS_THAN(FREERTOS_SPINLOCK_CYCLES_PER_OP, "%d cycles/op", ((end - start)/REPEAT_OPS));
#endif
}
TEST_CASE("portMUX recursive locks (no contention)", "[freertos]")