newlib locks: Fix _lock_init() & _lock_init_recursive() failing to initialise a lock
If scheduler was running, and lock was an automatic variable (ie stack-allocated) to be initialised by _lock_init*, initialisation could be skipped if the lock variable was non-zero (and lock would be left invalid). In other cases the lock is statically initialised to zero by __LOCK_INIT*
This commit is contained in:
parent
3bd3640d60
commit
09bb7a7650
1 changed files with 10 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -41,14 +41,16 @@
|
|||
|
||||
static portMUX_TYPE lock_init_spinlock = portMUX_INITIALIZER_UNLOCKED;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialise the given lock by allocating a new mutex semaphore
|
||||
/* Initialize the given lock by allocating a new mutex semaphore
|
||||
as the _lock_t value.
|
||||
|
||||
Called by _lock_init*, also called by _lock_acquire* to lazily initialize locks that might have
|
||||
been initialised (to zero only) before the RTOS scheduler started.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void IRAM_ATTR lock_init_generic(_lock_t *lock, uint8_t mutex_type) {
|
||||
portENTER_CRITICAL(&lock_init_spinlock);
|
||||
if (xTaskGetSchedulerState() == taskSCHEDULER_NOT_STARTED) {
|
||||
/* nothing to do until the scheduler is running */
|
||||
*lock = 0; /* ensure lock is zeroed out, in case it's an automatic variable */
|
||||
portEXIT_CRITICAL(&lock_init_spinlock);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -84,10 +86,12 @@ static void IRAM_ATTR lock_init_generic(_lock_t *lock, uint8_t mutex_type) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void IRAM_ATTR _lock_init(_lock_t *lock) {
|
||||
*lock = 0; // In case lock's memory is uninitialized
|
||||
lock_init_generic(lock, queueQUEUE_TYPE_MUTEX);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void IRAM_ATTR _lock_init_recursive(_lock_t *lock) {
|
||||
*lock = 0; // In case lock's memory is uninitialized
|
||||
lock_init_generic(lock, queueQUEUE_TYPE_RECURSIVE_MUTEX);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -96,6 +100,10 @@ void IRAM_ATTR _lock_init_recursive(_lock_t *lock) {
|
|||
Note that FreeRTOS doesn't account for deleting mutexes while they
|
||||
are held, and neither do we... so take care not to delete newlib
|
||||
locks while they may be held by other tasks!
|
||||
|
||||
Also, deleting a lock in this way will cause it to be lazily
|
||||
re-initialised if it is used again. Caller has to avoid doing
|
||||
this!
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void IRAM_ATTR _lock_close(_lock_t *lock) {
|
||||
portENTER_CRITICAL(&lock_init_spinlock);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue