From 38f18c7a7da859b27258db6b2d53fb7a6aaad0a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ray Jones Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 05:48:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update home --- home.md | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/home.md b/home.md index 14825c6..62529c7 100644 --- a/home.md +++ b/home.md @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ If your heater uses one of the following style controllers, this design **will** ### Controller loom connection The digital protocol controllers use one of 2 styles of loom connection. A 3 pin triangular waterproof conenctor, or a smaller round 3 pin waterproof connector: -![3pinplug](uploads/7fe89a4c612ef4b517a18193cc0d4228/3pinplug.jpg) - +triangular plug +circular plug ### Heater control PCB (remains in use) The all important part though is the control PCB within the heater. @@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ This is the PCB within a blue wire enabled heater that will 100% work with this The blue wire interface is circled in the following photo: ![20190111_083207](uploads/4d758c5478777c3b2077614956d23420/20190111_083207.jpg) Heater PCB - +![BlackControlBoardjpg](uploads/db63be81b675afc73be1c92bd94adcf4/BlackControlBoardjpg.jpg) +![Otherdigitalcontroller_-_Interface](uploads/bbf499abef8c41ac0b07d903287c6e8f/Otherdigitalcontroller_-_Interface.jpg) The important selection criteria is whether a dual transistor multiplexer is evident on the input path of the blue wire, this sort of topology **must** exist, if the wire runs direct to the microprocessor, it is most likely incompatible, and probably an analogue voltage from a pot: ![BlueWireIF](uploads/491d71e7576b446351d4634d30e1a038/BlueWireIF.PNG)